|
Interview
with Randy Grace
April 23, 2004
The following interview
was conducted by email, so please excuse any casual typos, idioms,
etc....
Duckhills Family:
When did you start playing guitar? What got you into guitar and
who were your earliest influences?
Randy Grace: My mother
got me a guitar for my 12th (?) birthday. I liked drawing guitars
and stuff but I hadn't had any previous desire to learn an instrument.
My earliest influences
were Angus Young (AC/DC) and Rick Nielsen (Cheap Trick)-the giants.
DF: How did The
Other Version get its start?
RG: I was in a band
when I was in junior hs, with a group of high school juniors from
a nearby town. They were clearly desperate for another guitar
player, so much so that they would take the like hour round-trip
to pick me up and drop me off for practices in the drummer's family's
farm's feed shed. I'm grateful to them for that, as well as for
giving me the opportunity to give a sincere try to a lot of drugs
that I wouldn't have known where to get on my own in rural Texas.
My lifelong love affair with beer started around this time. I
had pretty much everything I needed at that point, but I moved
to Houston when I was about 15, and that's where my music career
pretty much should have ended.
I really wanted to
be in a band again, but I didn't know any other people who played/who
I could stand.
I eventually met Jim
through my girlfriend. He wanted to learn the guitar. I showed
him three chords, and the next time I saw him he had written like
five or six good songs using those three chords. Every new chord
I showed him would expand his original repertoire exponentially,
and after maybe three "lessons" he had pretty much everything
he needed. By that time I had a 4-track and was recording my own
awful Peter Gabriel/U2 melange and had met a bass player and drummer
and we were playing. I organized a concert in the hs auditorium,
and then the bass player quit. Jim came in and took over on the
bass. Then the drummer quit on the day we were supposed to record
a demo, which is how Chad came in. Ben was singing with Chad's
band. I really didn't want another person in the band, but my
singing (as was repeatedly pointed out to me) was pathetic, so
Ben joined, and I was able to keep him from taking over as the
main songwriter for about 18 hours, right up until he learned
three chords (by himself). From that point on I was the "superfluous
member."
DF: Any particularly
memorable moments from your TOV days?
RG: None that I remember.
DF: When/how did
the concept of The Duckhills start taking shape?
RG: We decided to move
to Austin-I had never been there myself, but Timbuk3 was from
there and they were on MTV, so we figured it was just a matter
of time before we were too. It was closer than Athens GA, so we
moved there. Chad left suddenly, and we were just floored. Literally-when
I heard that he had taken off, and that we were without a drummer,
I just lay down on the floor of the living room in the house I
was renting with two lovely lady journalism students, realizing
for the first-and-not-last time that I really, really hated music.
But that's really where
the duckhills came from. With all of our plans in a slimy hairball-looking
mess down the drain, Ben and Jim, Gary, Brad, Dalton and various
others just started hanging around every night at the house, making
up songs and turning into something thoroughly different. We did
everything we could to try to find a drummer, but we were in a
brand-new city and even more clueless than nearly-full-grown men
really had any excuse to be. We invited guys over to play, and
we actually had some great drummers come by, but they wouldn't
join. In hindsight (goddamn you, hindsight!), it's obvious why:
we thought anyone who joined our band had to be exactly like us.
They would have had to renounce any other band they played with
and would need to practically marry us. We didn't realize that
this wasn't the done thing in Austin. We scared off any number
of likely candidates with our heavy breathing before we shanghaied
Brian into joining. He had everything we were looking for-he'd
already left his drum set (a Reuther, best American-made drums
ever) in our living room and he had no place to live. He was actually
a great drummer, and perfect for us, goddammit, but at the time,
his willingness to pay rent was the main thing.
We rehearsed right
there in our living room (I wasn't actually living there at the
time, in keeping with my superfluity) every night, and by the
time we played our first show, at a co-op party, we were absolutely
awesome. We mocked the other groups we played with for being so
lame and ad hoc, but again, we didn't know anything about Austin
at the time. The prevailing ethic with bands was that you didn't
take it seriously. Being tight was kind of uncool, because it
showed that you spent all your time rehearsing and didn't get
out enough. That, however, was what made us have an impact, I
think. By the time we played a club (Cannibal Club on a tuesday
night), we were kick ass and we had like sixty people willing
to pay two bucks to see us.
DF: What is the
"build-a-goat" story?
RG: If you called Jim's
house in Houston and asked what he was doing, he'd answer "Nothing,
just building a goat."
DF: Was there an
explicit evolution of the band's music or efforts from Spongecake
to Litter? (that is, was the writing process the same over the
years, or did you all as writers have have a different goal for,
say, Litter than Kayak?)
RG: Ben's work with
Dalton and the nightly bacchanals with Jim et al (90% of which
I wasn't there for) generated about a million songs by the time
that Spongecake was recorded. We just wanted them all on tape.
I had this weird six-track cassette recorder and a bunch of microphones
purchased from pawnshops all over American South, and we recorded
all the basic tracks at the house and then took the tapes into
a studio to do vocals and other overdubs. By then, we had managers,
and they told us that the stuff we recorded ourselves sounded
terrible and begged us to do it right. So we had to choose which
songs to spend money on and do it that way. It was a huge struggle.
I was actually all for the full studio idea, because I still clung
to the idea that it was my band, and I calculated that my songs
might stand a greater chance of getting that studio sheen if we
did it that way. Yet another in a series of poor decisions on
my part. Well, I guess it really was a better way of doing things,
to put out 12 songs (how many songs were on Spongecake? 12? 14?
16?) rather than 25, even though it was my engineering ox that
was getting gored in throwing out all of those home-recorded efforts.
Ben was really crushed, though, and he was right, considering
how amateurish Spongecake eventually turned out; we could just
have easily put out all of those songs-it's not like Spongecake
was anybody's idea of a usable demo tape.
But it was maybe a
good lesson, better learnt then than later. When we did Kayak,
we didn't mess around so much. We recorded the whole thing in
like a day, even with all the unplanned stuff, like the piano
parts that Ben and Jim did. That record really should have turned
out better than it did.
Before we did Litter,
we recorded like six songs with a producer. It was eye-opening
for me, because I had a few songs that were "my" songs,
and the producer immediately discarded them, because they weren't
worth a damn. But I don't know what ever happened to the songs
we recorded that time. They were good, but they kind of disappeared
once we started touring.
With Litter, we were
determined to make a "good" record. We had just finished
touring with Poi Dog Pondering and had sold a whole bunch of Kayaks
and we were kind of gnashing our teeth thinking "that's not
really what we sound like."
We had a producer again, Stewart Sullivan, renowned for being
a super-patient, nice guy. After three days with the duckhills,
he was ready to murder us (justifiable homicide).
My own personal goal
was to record more of "my" songs, but in the end I failed
to put any serious effort into developing the songs I was writing
into viable things. I acted like if they weren't immediately perfect,
then there was no point in belaboring them. The songs that I sang
on Litter made it on just because they were the easiest to play
and could be recorded with the least amount of fuss, not because
they were very good.
DF: Which Duckhills
songs, if any, stand out in your memory as ones you are particularly
proud of?
RG: I always thought
"I live I die" was really great. "Obvious"
was also great. It was our usual set opener. "Slide"
too. As far as songs that I can be personally proud of, I liked
"freaky transactions"-the song is great, of course,
and the guitar was kind of featured, especially live. I loved
"An emotional day" because it was such a great song,
first of all-Ben was like, what, 22 years old and wrote a song
like that?-but personally, I played a guitar part that actually
added to the song. Meaning that, I kind of hate the guitar, because
while you can barely make rock music without it, a whole lot of
songs are ruined by guitar players. So I was immensely proud of
that little solo, because it made me like the song even more.
It was like, I managed to play an expression of how much I loved
that song.
Of my own songs, "helen"
I like.
Some of the unrecorded
songs were great live. Ben wrote "watch me sleep" and
we were doing it as the first or second song on the set and god,
it was cool. We played the Texas Ballroom, this huge ornate banquet
hall with hardwood floors and chandeliers, and I think we did
that song first, and I remember how happy I was, being in this
great band.
DF: Do you have
a most memorable moment from the Duckhills days?
RG: cf. "duckhills
tour diary" @ www.garygilliam.com/writs/duckhills/randydiary.htm
DF: What was your
rig at this point -- guitar, amp, etc.? (I've seen some tapes,
but can't recognize the guitar)
RG: When we were playing
as the duckhills, I mainly used the old Gretsch 6120 that I use
now. It's utterly worthless-the only original thing on it is the
volume knob and the paint on the headstock. I also used a Telecaster
that I think is fake, a 1969 Les Paul Personal that has a microphone
input on the top and an SG. I had a Fender Studio 70 which I bought
for the Anvil case, and then a Vibroverb reissue when I got tired
of how bad it sounded.
DF: After the Duckhills
parted ways, did you have any more musical endeavors before moving
to Japan?
RG: I meant to write
and record a brilliant album, but I never got further than the
song titles and jacket design.
DF: What took you
to Japan, and when?
RG: I was tour-managing
Cotton Mather, (a great band that's big in Europe but can't get
arrested in Austin. They actually get mocked in the local press
for continuing to stick it out-in between trips to Europe to play
with Oasis in 60,000-seat venues, that is. Yet another reason
why living in Austin will drive you insane) before I left Austin
to help my family run a restaurant in rural Alabama (in the continuing
series of poorly-thought-out decisions). They (Cotton Mather)
went to Japan to do some shows and asked me to come. I think they
felt that my language ability would come in handy-I spoke Spanish,
and the engineer spoke Cajun French. I would have never had a
chance to come to Japan otherwise, and-let's not forget-I was
running a restaurant with my family in rural Alabama at the time.
If I'd been offered the chance to strip asbestos in Burkina Faso
I would have lunged at it.
Everyone I met in Japan
was nice and real impressed with my Spanish, and when they would
ask me, What do you think of Japan? I would say "hey it's
great, wouldn't mind living here, etc." I said that everywhere
I went (rural Alabama, remember), but in Japan people took it
serious-like, and gave me all kinds of information about jobs
and living in Japan, and so a few months later I moved here.
DF: When did you
begin work on the music that eventually became "Made by Elaborate
Process" (and is it ok to refer to that album with that title?)
RG: I was totally out
of music when I came here; I didn't bring a guitar or anything.
None of my more worthwhile hobbies were panning out, though, and
I started going to music stores again, where I discovered that
used equipment-stuff I had always been too poor to buy when it
was new-was considered practically junk in Tokyo. I bought a bunch
of microphones and preamps and stuff and when I went back to the
states I hauled back a guitar and a mixing board. I still wasn't
really writing music, but once I had a certain critical mass of
gear, I really had no choice but to make something up so I could
record it.
Something I hadn't anticipated was, at some point you get all
the gear you really need, and when you realize that there's no
reason to skulk around music stores anymore, a terrible emptiness
descends-the disquieting realization that shopping for recording
gear is a lot more fun than making music could ever be, that music
is a vehicle for buying gear. So that's why I make music. Because
I'm so ashamed.
But anyway, "made
by elaborate process" is the title, so yes, people are encouraged
to call it that.
DF: Can you straighten
out the rumors about the recording process -- the /elaborate/
process, if you will - of that album?
What rumors? About
17 people have heard the record. What are they saying?
DF: Any funny stories
there?
RG: There's a disclaimer
in Japanese on the back cover stating "Nothing amusing occurred
during the recording of this album." It's true.
DF: When did you
decide to take Ok City Ok out into the public as a performing
band?
RG: I have been trying
to convince people to play with me for about three years now-longer
than the duckhills even existed. I have had two intermittent periods
where I got a quorum together long enough to play live.
DF: Are you considering
or working on a new album?
RG: I've got a lot
of songs that I keep meaning to work on. (The song titles themselves
are all done.)
DF: How do the audiences
in Japan differ from those in the US (if at all)?
RG: If someone is invited
to go see a band, they will usually borrow or rent a cd (you can
do that here) and study it. The idea is like, you can't really
enjoy a band unless you know the songs. I guess not everybody
is like that, but still, every once in a while someone complains
that I didn't play my own songs "right."
One thing is that it's
much harder to just go out and see a rock band play in Japan.
Bands don't play in bars, they play at "live houses"
which charge like twenty bucks for people to get in, so people
go and see the band they know. The door person asks you "which
band are you here to see?"
DF: Ok, some general
"About Randy" style questions:
Which decade's
music do you find the most enjoyable?
RG: I've never thought
about it. I'm going to play a bar by myself next month (mostly
covers) and I was thinking of doing like three sets, about 40
songs, one year at a time chronologically starting at 1964. Sounds
like a good idea, but then now that I think about it, I don't
think I can name any songs that came out this year.
DF: What event in
known history would you most like to have been present for?
I would have liked
to be there when Prince was mixing "when doves cry."
I wish fervently that I had been born Prince, because he is funky.
DF: Do you have
a favorite author or book?
RG: Glad you asked!
Donald Barthelme The Dead Father
Thomas Pynchon V
Richard Dawkins The Selfish Gene
DF: Do you ever
plan on moving back to the US?
RG: It's hard to think
about going back. I don't know if I'll be in Japan for many more
years, though. I've never lived anywhere as long as I've lived
here.
DF: Do you have
a favorite Japanese TV show?
RG: There's a show
called
Sekai Ururun Taizaiki which is listed in English as "World
Traveler" or something like that. They send an aspiring "tarento"
(tv celebrity) to stay for a while with a family in some other
part of the world, usually to learn some skill. It's very eclectic-people
learn to draw a pint of Guinness in County Cork or skin a lemur
in New Guinea. The thing is, these celebrities don't act like
celebrities at all; they really knock themselves out to be good
apprentices. In keeping with Japanese cultural practice, they
refer to the members of their host family as "Mother,"
"Father," etc., and usually end up getting really attached
to them, so much so that at the end of the trip they're sobbing
in abject heartbreak. I used to mock it and call it "Worldwide
Tearjerking Diary," but now I get all teary myself watching
it.
Once I learned Japanese,
I found out that the Japanese title translates as: Worldwide Tearjerking
Diary.
DF: Ok, I'm afraid
of going crazy with questions, so I'll stop there -- I hope this
isn't too lame!
RG: I'll be the judge
of what is and isn't lame around here. If things get lame, I'll
make eye contact with you while adjusting my cummerbund. If you
see that happening, that means something got lame, and let's split.
(If I inadvertently make eye contact with you while non-subtextually
adjusting my cummerbund, I'll negate the "lame sign"
by moving the Mont Blanc Anniversary Series Fountain Pen, which
I customarily keep in the breast pocket of my shirt, to the inside
pocket of my blazer. If the formality of the occasion does not
rise to the level of cummerbunds (for example, a beach barbeque
or a cockfight), please remind me beforehand to establish an alternate
"lame sign" and negating sign.)
DF: Cheers!!
RG: To you as well!
Duckhills Family: We would like to thank Randy immensely for taking the time to participate in this interview!
Return
to Top
Return
To Articles and Interviews
|